Optimal Taxation and Education Policy with Skill-Biased Technological Change

Other Papers
Bas Jacobs, Uwe Thuemmel
Year: 2015

We study the effect of skill-biased technological change (SBTC) on optimal linear income taxation and education subsidies in a model with heterogeneous individuals who – on the extensive margin – decide whether or not to attend college, and who supply labor on the intensive margin. If rising tuition fees are taken into account, SBTC increases the college wage premium and raises the share of college graduates. Optimal income taxes trade off distributional benefits against tax distortions on both, labor supply and the education decision. The distortions on the education decision are partly offset by the optimal college subsidy, which in addition helps redistribution by depressing the college wage premium. The effects of SBTC on optimal policy are analytically ambiguous. Using simulation, we find that optimal transfers increase in response to SBTC, making the tax system more progressive. However, the optimal tax and subsidy rate hardly change. Still, setting tax and subsidy rate non-optimally can lead to large welfare losses.

Globalization or skill-biased technical change? Exploring the proximate causes for rising wage inequality in the Dutch manufacturing sector

Other Papers
Uwe Thuemmel
Year: 2013

Using matched employer-employee data for the Netherlands, this paper studies the proximate causes of increasing wage inequality associated with globalization and skill-biased technical change: it investigates the extent to which changes in the employment share of exporters and the exporter premium, as well as changes in the share of college graduates and the college premium have contributed to rising wage inequality in the Dutch manufacturing sector between 2001 and 2005. Decomposition techniques are used to attribute changes in the wage distribution to three components: changes in returns to characteristics, composition changes, and changes in the distribution of residuals. The main findings are as follows: first, the exporter premium changed only slightly between 2001 and 2005, thus contributing little to rising inequality; second, an increasing exporter-employment share modestly decreased overall wage dispersion; third, a rising college premium contributed between 8% and 16% to inequality growth; fourth, the contribution of a rising share of college graduates to inequality explains more than 30% of the increase in dispersion. It is concluded that if globalization contributed to wage inequality, it did so via the skill- rather than the exporter premium.